Maxime Chazal vs Petr Brunclik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 May at 05:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Chazal vs P. Brunclik

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chazal 1 - 0 Brunclik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maxime Chazal winning 2 and Petr Brunclik winning 0. The last match between Maxime Chazal and Petr Brunclik was at the Prague Challenger, 07-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chazal | 1 |
| Brunclik | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Prague Challenger(05-07-25)
M. Chazal vs P. Brunclik H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,860 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.29% (507-334) | Career Total W/L | 60.17% (71-47) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Chazal vs P. Brunclik Match Preview:
- Brunclik shows a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 45.32% compared to Chazal's 43.87% over the last six months. Does this give Brunclik an advantage? Indeed, it suggests better serve stability.
- In return games, Brunclik has also outperformed Chazal with 49.82% of second serve return points won versus 47.97%. First serve return points are similarly close, with Brunclik at 29.17% and Chazal at 29.01%.
- When evaluating under pressure, Brunclik has saved 56.99% of breakpoints, marginally more efficient than Chazal's 53.67%.
- Analyzing overall performance in the last year reveals Brunclik's win rate at 61.36%, closely matched by Chazal's 61.04%.
- Brunclik excels on Hard courts with a 73% win rate, while Chazal's preferred surface is Clay, achieving a 63% win rate.
- At the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF level, Chazal has performed better with a 71.11% win rate compared to Brunclik’s 59.46%.
- The quality of opponents is similar, with Brunclik facing an average rank of 392.41 and Chazal 391.44.
- In deciding sets, Chazal has a higher success rate of 60% over the last year, compared to Brunclik’s 46%.
- Finally, Chazal excels in breakpoint conversion, managing a notable 39.77%, which surpasses Brunclik’s 26.06%.
Editorial Prediction (May 6, 2025, UTC):
As we look at the comparative statistics, Brunclik demonstrates a mild advantage in serving and returning second serves, suggesting a slight edge in controlling rallies and potentially stabilizing under pressure situations.
However, Chazal’s consistency in higher breakpoint conversion and superior capacity to navigate deciding sets indicates a spirited resilience that could prove decisive in critical moments.
While both players have performed differently on varying surfaces, the current matchup leans towards Chazal’s strengths, particularly in pressure moments and converting opportunities into game wins.
Given the closely matched abilities, Chazal’s efficient breakpoint conversion and ability to seal deciding sets give him the edge as the likely winner in this upcoming match.
Maxime Chazal vs Petr Brunclik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Chazal vs P. Brunclik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:28:34 | Average Match Time | 1:28:34 |
| 64% (39/61) | 1st Serve % | 69% (33/48) |
| 69% (27/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (4/15) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 54% (26/48) | Return Points Win % | 39% (24/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Chazal Recent Matches Played
P. Brunclik Recent Matches Played

M. Chazal vs P. Brunclik Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.29% (507/334) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.17% (71/47) |
| 58.10% (1115/804) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.58% (157/111) |
| 53.53% (9542/8282) | Games Win/Loss | 53.18% (1338/1178) |
| 43.48% (30/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 72.92% (35/13) |
| 62.87% (469/277) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.17% (32/26) |
| 30.77% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1057 | Aces Total | 331 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1473 | Total Double Faults | 328 |
| 1:19:45 | Average Match Time | 1:41:22 |
| 566.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.86 |
| 68% (28327/41913) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4613/7274) |
| 65% (18335/28327) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3113/4613) |
| 49% (6630/13585) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1344/2661) |
| 47% (2200/4721) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (352/881) |
| 43% (17613/40855) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3206/7733) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.50% (68/92) | Challenger W/L | 59.52% (25/17) |
| 65.42% (437/231) | Futures W/L | 60.53% (46/30) |
| 61% (500/820) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (71/117) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (100/197) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (16/29) |
| 59% (151/254) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (19/34) |
| 88% (480/420) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (67/62) |
| 12% (480/58) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (67/5) |
| 24% (360/87) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (50/9) |